Thursday, October 23, 2014

The Difference Between a Disciple and an Apostle

****Disclaimer****

What you are about to read is MY response to a question someone had for me.  It may or may not be THE answer.  In the event that MY answer is not THE answer, I do hope that some of these insights may be helpful.

The Question

What is the difference between a disciple and an apostle?


Perhaps the greatest difference between these two words are their respective functions. Each word seemed to have been generally understood in its time.  One word is used to describe the relationship between people.  The other word is meant to describe a person's role.  Before I define them, I will illustrate the difference within the context of family.

  I am a father of four children.  I am also their provider.  The words 'father' and 'provider' serve two distinctly different  descriptive functions.  Father is used to identify my relationship to my family.  Provider helps to describe part of my role in my family. (Of course, God is the true Father and Provider.)

As the word father defines my relationship to my family, the word disciple is used to define the type of relationship between people. Likewise, the word apostle is an identifier for a persons role within the people of Christ.

The Role - Apostle

Apostle 1:  One sent on a mission.

An apostle is generally interpreted to mean, "Ultra spectacular, miracle working, ultimate Christian."  However, the word apostle literally means, one who is sent on a mission.  The body of Christ still consists of people who are gifted and sent on missions by The Holy Spirit, but we have given them another name.  I will let you try and guess what we call them now.


The Relationship - Disciple

The word disciple identifies a very specific kind of relationship.  It's kind of like being a follower and a student, but I'm certain entails much more.  Whereas the end goal for a student is to learn what the teacher knows, the end for a disciple is to become what the discipler is.  Being a disciple of Christ therefore goes far beyond learning what He taught, but involves us becoming like Him. 

Monday, August 25, 2014

ASL 2014 Annual Review

Well soccer fans, another year in the Abell Soccer league has come to a close.  The time has therefore come when we recap this seasons highlights.

This being her 8th year in the ASL, Rachael has once again demonstrated her reliability  on the rearguard of her team.  Although the Durkees coaching staff saw in her the flexibility to serve in various roles on the field, it was her firm and reliable skill as a defender which kept her as the final line between the the net, and opposing strikers.  It was her part of this stone wall that kept the team undefeated in tournament play.

There were no surprises as Jerry, the youngest Abell took the field for this 2014 under 9 season.  Solid between the posts as usual, so steady in fact, that his team posted a league best .58 goals against average, Jerry put up 6 shutouts for the season.  Also producing offensively for his team with 5 goals and five assists, he helped his team to handily capture first place for their level.

With twice as many Abell's on the team, Peloquin Promotional Printing was the team to watch.  Starting off the year with three straight losses, and only 1 win in their first six games, it looked as though the year would amount to one of pain, suffering and defeat.  Through hard work, persistence and determination, the season ended very differently from how it began, placing second overall.

Part of the team's resurgence was due to the reliability of their starting net minder, the strapping Marlow Abell.  Although statistically average, with one shut out during the regular season, and one in tournament play, game after game he provided consistently secure coverage as keeper.  It was this security at their back which provided the team with the drive forward, knowing the net was looked after.  

With two competent net minders, and a solid defender, Ned provided the bulk of Team Abell's offence.   Having scored a total of zero goals in his last three seasons, he took East Elgin Youth Soccer by complete surprise, leading his team both in goals and assists.  When asked why he went three full years without so much as even one goal, Ned gave this response,
"I was saving up, waiting to really deliver the wow factor."

Deliver he did, his training, speed and endurance allowing him to tally 13 goals.   Not being a very intimidating presence to look at, his line was often referred to as "the little people". And with an impressive 18 assists, he was obviously not a ball hog. 

Now with a fist and second place finish for team Abell, the question we now ask is this, how can they possibly improve next year?  Time will tell.

Saturday, July 5, 2014

Publicly Rebuking Sin

This week I was asked, "Why don't churches discipline like this?":

"Those who sin should be reprimanded in front of the whole church; this will serve as a strong warning to others."  (1 Timothy 5:20)

As much as I would like to answer this one thoroughly, I don't believe it's possible to do so succinctly, because the truth is, there are many reasons why we don't see this kind of discipline very often in our churches.  Some reasons are biblical, and some reasons reveal our own shortcomings.  I will briefly list a few, and comment only on a few of them.

1. The internet has helped greatly.  Now it often even happens in front of the whole world.
2. This kind of Church gathering rebuking was rare in scripture, taking place once as we know it in the Corinthian church.  Likewise, it should be rare among us.
3. The kind of sin.  In Corinth, the kind of sin that was dealt with publicly, was obvious enough, that even the pagans didn't do that kind of thing.
4. Lack of discernment among leadership.  When do you make the call to subject someone to that kind of public shame?
5. The kind of sin at hand has affected our own lives, and therefore clouds our judgment.
6. We often have a desire to protect the dignity and integrity of the people under our care.  (Is that Jesus?  That can be debated)
7. The nature of sin itself (hide it)
8. I know it's not biblical, but public defamation of character can have legal implications
9. Protecting the victims

Lack of Discernment Among Leadership.

The only people in our churches who know exactly what should be done, tend to be the back seat leaders.  In our day, they write blogs, post their opinions on social media and speak quite authoritatively on what needs to be done by pastors and churches.

The people who are actually in authority, have a much more difficult time making the kind of decisions their calling demands.  It's not that they don't study scripture, pray or know their bibles.  We just don't always know.  I'm sorry for that.

Suppose a teenager gets pregnant with her boyfriend.  We know that her and her boyfriend fornicated.  It happens.  With sin, how do you get to the bottom of it?  Are they still  fornicating?  How do you find out for sure?  Sin is like black tar.  It's wretched and sticky.  People lie about sin.  They hide it.  They say they don't when they actually do.  They don't want to expose it.  What if the two are going to get married?  Is that what needs to be done from here on out, or should they be excommunicated?  If they aren't a member of the church, but come once in a while, can you rebuke them if they aren't an active part of the church?

Back seat Christians normally have very definite answers to these kinds of questions.  Elders like me normally do not.  My hunch is that if the back seat people were called to the role, they wouldn't continue to have the same confidence in their assertions.  (As for me, if someone comes along who is truly better fit to fill my role, I will gladly step aside.  In fact, I am often looking for just such an opportunity)

When To Make that Call

The kind of sin we see being exposed in the church in scripture, is the kind of sin that would have been alarming, even to pagans.  There is a tendency to hide the sin among us, even when it is alarming and should be exposed.  The news is often bringing to light instances of sexual abuse, where a church knew about it, and did nothing with it.  This should never be the case.

These kinds of glaring things tend to be rare, both in scripture and in real life.  It's not that these kinds of sins are rare in the world, in fact, they go on all of the time.  What I mean is that, most often, people who really want to intentionally pursue a life of blatant sin, generally walk away from God anyway.  Maybe they don't recognize it overtly, but something in our spirit knows that light has no fellowship with darkness.



Protecting The Victim

       Part of the nature of sin, is that there is nearly always collateral damage.  Sin nearly always affects individuals other than the culprit.  Whether right or wrong, consideration is often given towards the victims of sin.
Husband X commits adultery on Wife Y, with woman Q.  Q was married  to her husband P.  X and Q have committed an obvious act of adultery.  This isn't one of those cloudy mirky issues.  They weren't supposed to do that kind of thing.  Wife Y is a valuable part of your congregation.  Her life is ruined.  Husband X really isn't continuing to be an active part of the church anyway.  Wife Y is desperately trying to continue to follow Jesus, but raising her kids all on her own, and trying to work and raise her family is already more than she can bear.

How do you get husband X to come back to church long enough to expose him?  Wife Y begs and pleads with you not to make her life a Sunday morning spectacle, the shame of it already being too much to bear on its own.

This happens way too much. The names change, but the sins remain the same.

Some Final Thoughts

I know I haven't addressed even half of the items I brought up.  In short, there are times when sin needs to be rebuked in front of the church, although the kind of sin where we are called to do so is not an everyday affair.  The majority of rebuking in scripture is done person to person (Jesus rebuked Peter, Peter rebuking Simon the sorcerer, Paul rebuking Peter), not during a Church meeting like in Corinth.

Confronting each other isn't something to shy away from, but my hope for you is that you will not be drawn to the kind of "Christianity", where rebuking and correcting is the main endeavour.  

Sunday, May 25, 2014

It IS Right

"So it is right that I should feel as I do about all of you, for you have a special place in my heart. You share with me the special favor of God...." . (Philippians 1:7 NLT)

How often do you hear pastors talk like that to "their people"?   

Sometimes, I wonder if something is wrong with me.  And by the time I explain what is wrong with me, it will seem obvious that it is in fact right.  I feel like a broken record, because I have written this blog post many times and in different forms.

In 2000, my wife and I began ministering to a group of high school aged youth at our home church, and after high school, they went off to pursue their own lives.   We have been fortunate that many of them are still living in the area, but the circumstances of life are such that we aren't able to see each other as we once did.

I often catch myself thinking of them, so much so, that I wonder if I'm somehow supposed to forget them and move on in some way.  The undeniable truth is however, that I am completely unable to stop caring deeply for them, and for what happens to them.

Last evening, my wife and I had the privilege of witnessing one of these young men marry "the woman of his dreams".  As we caught up with old friends, it became obvious to me, that the enduring love we have for our fellow believers isn't something we need to 'get over', rather, it is something that is right.

It can hurt when we miss and long for people who have moved on in life, yet I am convinced the pain is meant to highlight the injustices of life that are meant to be solved when at last we gather at an even greater wedding feast; The Marriage of The Lamb.  There are two great tragedies I am certain will be resolved when we walk together in final glory.

Intimacy 

I know I'm not alone.  It's like I have this heart full of love, and no matter what I say or what I do, I am completely incapable of fully expressing it.  I always have in mind the things I want to convey to the people I love, but it never comes out in full force, no matter how often I rehearse, how often I say it or how beautiful it sounded in my head.

I can't say this with absolute certainty, because I don't have the backing of scripture, but I anticipate, that this is one injustice that is meant to be resolved.  How beautiful it would be if we were fully able to articulate that love that we have for each other!

Time

This I do know.  Eternity with Christ offers without cost, that commodity which is so limited to us now.  As I spent last evening trying to connect with old friends, there just wasn't enough time, and as much as I would like to connect on some other evening, there still isn't enough time.  Even for those people who I had a decent conversation with, we really never had sufficient time to fully grasp what life is like for each other.

Maybe some of you like the idea of Heaven, but you're planning on getting there without Jesus.  I don't know how to politely break it to you, but the kind of love that Paul had for the people of Philippi, and the kind of love I have for my Christian brothers and sisters is inherently a Jesus thing.  What are you basing eternity on?  Your own wishful thinking?  You weren't as bad as the next guy?  You have done less bad stuff in 2014 than you did in 2013?

The marriage of Christ is for His people.  How else did you think it was supposed to work?

It is right that I miss you.  It is right, because the kind of love believers have for each other has nothing to do with sexuality, but everything to do with The Spirit who lives within them.   It's right, because it keeps me focused on Christ, as the only hope of rectifying that which has been broken.  It is right, because scripture says it's right.




PS. Just because 2 people love each other doesn't meant they have to have sex.  Somebody PLEASE find a way to explain that to the world!!!!  I have been completely unsuccessful, and I even wrote a book.

Thursday, April 3, 2014

Many are Called. Few are Chosen



This past week, I was asked to share my thoughts on Matthew 22:14.

"For many are called, but few are chosen". Matthew 22:14

On the surface, it sounds as if God runs an elitist social club. Or better yet, He's looked at, as the head coach for an Olympic hockey team, choosing only the best of the best, snubbing everyone who just doesn't make the cut.

As I look at this verse, I am going to view it in light of three things. I am going to begin by looking at two words: Call, and Choose. I am also going to look at the statement in the context in which it is presented. So, there will be three C's to this.   Call, Choose and Context.


  Call

Marriage is the theme of this passage found in Matthew 22:1-14, so it is wise to look at the language of the verse in that light.  In the English Standard Version, the word "call" is actually used in verse 3 of the text. So what does it mean to 'call' anyway? It's kind of an old word in many respects.

There was a day when young men used to 'come calling'. They don't do that much anymore. If you want to get an idea of what it means to call on someone, watching old black and white movies or westerns would be a good place to start.

When a young man had a fancy for a young lady, it was common for him to go to her house. Imagine it if you can. The calling, was a way to formally express your interest, both to the young lady, as well as her parents. It was also a time for a young couple to safely "check each other out", so to speak.

Calling is a seeking out, and this seeking out, is precisely what we see in this passage. We see a King, sending his servants to "call those who were invited" Matt 22:3. That is the word in it's proper context. Many are called, or sought out. How did the King respond when the people he called, refused to come? He responded by calling more. He told his servants to "go to the main roads and invite to the wedding feast as many as you can find." Matthew 22:9

That is the picture of God, inviting as many people as can be found. That's what God does, and His people do their best to do just that. They do what they can to invite as many as can be found. As for me, I do everything I can to invite as many as I can, to know Jesus. I write books. I write blogs. I invite people to church. I preach. I am not alone. There are many like me, doing what they can, to call as many as they can.

Choose
I chose Barb. Do you know why I chose Barb? Because Barb chose me. Christians debate back and forth over whether God chooses people, or they choose Him. It's both. It is always both, and can be no other way. God chooses those who choose Him.

How else can it work? Unfortunately (it is unfortunate in my mind), few are chosen, and the reason so few are chosen, is because so few respond to the call. Again, by calling, I mean that few respond to the invitation - the seeking. Their reasons vary, but essentially, they have other things in mind to do with their lives than to respond to the invitation. They just don't want to go to the wedding feast.

Christians do what they can to invite all they can. Tell me you haven't heard this complaint, "People shouldn't try to force their religion on other people?" As for force, there is some truth in it. Faith in Christ isn't a thing to be forced. Most of the time however, people actually resent even being invited. The complaint itself, is normally verbalized by someone who does not want to follow Jesus.

Few are chosen, because few choose. How does our world respond to hearing what God has to say about issues? Suppose we are talking about a kind of sexual activity that God is not fine with. When Christians tell the world, "God is not fine with you using your body like that", what is the response? Have you EVER heard the world respond, "Gee. Thank you very much. We didn't know what God thought about that!"? There is a very clear resistance to God Himself.

Even in a country that is supposedly predominantly Christian, it is so painfully obvious that God is the last person we are interested in following. We don't mind being ethical or humanitarian, but we aren't all that fond of responding to the call. We just don't want to go to the wedding feast.


Context

I have touched on the context already, but feel it is necessary to expand. The context, is set with the backdrop of a king, inviting his people to a wedding feast. The people he invited initially never responded. So he sent his servants again, letting them know that he has a great feast prepared for them, and he really wants them there. At this, many of the invitees just went their own way. Others actually seized the messengers,treated them shamefully, even killing some. Seeing his servants mistreated and killed, he rightfully punishes them, and sends other servants to invite all who can be found.

This is the backdrop to the very story of the world. Many of God's servants are mistreated. Many are even killed.

Many were called. Many were sought out. Many were invited. Few responded.

When we read, "Many are called, few are chosen", on the surface, it sounds as if God runs an elitist social club. Or better yet, He's looked at as the head coach for an Olympic hockey team, choosing only the best of the best, snubbing everyone who just doesn't make the cut. The reality of the situation lies in stark contrast to this, God being a King, who almost seems to be begging His subjects to enjoy His delicacies.

Part of the reason we see God as an elite hockey coach, is because we have lost the sense of language itself. Our loss of language is perhaps the greatest obstacle facing our world, because without it's understanding, we are unable to process truth. Gay, used to mean happy. Calling used to be synonymous with seeking. Tolerance has now become confused with approval. Our language is so messed, to the point where we are no longer able to have reasonable dialogue.

To call, is to seek out. God is not an Olympic hockey coach, looking for the best of the best. He has set an amazing feast and is sending his servants out to call all who can be found. He chooses those who choose to respond. Few respond. They have other things going on.


Sunday, March 30, 2014

The Church Does Nothing

This past week, I was having lunch with a believing friend of mine.  Overall, our time together was a time of encouragement.  He said something however, that at the time, I didn't quite know how to respond to.

As I was sipping on my coffee, he looked at me rather directly and said, "The church is doing absolutely nothing in the community or the world."

My immediate response was to simply agree with him.  I have mulled over and wrestled with his statement every day since.  Depending on the audience this reaches, many of you have had similar thoughts.  "The church needs to do something!"

As I have continued to reflect, I found myself thinking of the lady from our church who administers the local food bank.  Then I thought of the guy who helps homeless teens find a place to live.  And there is the lady who spends her life caring for new moms.

This morning, our pastor told us about a group of ladies in our church who made approximately 700 articles of clothing for aids victims in Africa.  You might not value the work done by Compassion, but they do their best to help children escape poverty, and a few people from our church work there.  I also know Christians who try to help hurricane victims.  

No matter what her people do, somehow, the accusation still seems to stand.  The church doesn't do anything to help anyone.  Why does it stand?  And why don't I have a decent response when I face those indictments? 

"you yourselves like living stones are being built up as a spiritual house, to be a holy priesthood, to offer spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ." (1 Peter 2:5 ESV)

Peter tells us in his first letter, that we, as believers are to be a holy priesthood.  
Yet in most minds, if the pastor or leadership are not the ones who are doing something, then it doesn't reflect on the church. How come?

I don't expect the world to recognize that our individual actions are the very actions of the church.  It is disappointing when believers do the same, and I disappoint myself when, in the moment, I am personally unable to verbalize how beautiful the bride of Christ can be.

I want you to know, that what you do matters, even if nobody recognizes it.  I also hope that you recognize, that the leadership in your church doesn't have to try and do the things that you are passionate about.  That's why they have you.  (Assuming that you are in fact part of the holy priesthood, and not on the other team)

Are you the church?

Friday, February 7, 2014

Theories

    Theories are a very odd creature.  In our minds, we know they don't necessarily represent reality, but we cling to them as if they do.  If you have lived for any length of time, no doubt you have found that some of your personal theories about how life works just didn't prove to be true.  Of course, it is much easier to recognize when the theories of other people fail.

   When my wife and I decided to homeschool our first born, we met a great deal of opposition.  The opposition rarely had anything whatsoever to do with what we were actually doing.  The objections always came out of the personal theories held by others.  Here are a few such theories....

1.  Your child won't known how to socialize.
2.  If your child doesn't go to public school, they might get along fine in "the church", but they will have a difficult time relating to unbelievers.
3.  Being homeschooled, they will experience culture shock when they enter the real world.

  Even though these were little more than theories, many held on to them adamantly, as if they were a kind of universally accepted law.

   I'm not here to defend homeschooling.  In fact, I don't much care how you school your children.  I'm quite at ease either watching you stand or fall as you live by your own theories.  That might sound mean.  Would you rather me be a tyrant?  

  What I can say looking back, is that the kinds of theories voiced against us really didn't turn out to be true.  If anything, our first born has had a much easier time finding her way in the world as a believer, than she has at finding her place in the church. 

  We stand or fall as we take on the consequences of the theories we have chosen to live by.  I may fall just yet over some that I have chosen.

  This morning I woke up reading about two men trying to defend their theories.  You may have heard of them;  Bill Nye and Ken Ham.  What I read reminded me of how we eventually come to face the reality of the theories we have lived by, and how ultimately, we are without excuse.

  Reality tends to be a rather tough taskmaster, but only insofar as it's resisted.  I think it tends to be that way, because we spend so much time trying to prove our point and defend our theories instead of embracing that whatever is - is.

  Here is what I know for sure.  We're all going to die.  I also know for sure that we are going to spend a lot more time after we die than what we spent here alive on earth.  You can bank on that.

  I also know this:  If there is a God, Bill Nye is without excuse when he meets Him.  He has clearly thought things through, and made his conclusions.  Maybe Ken Ham didn't do that best job in the world, but he did everything he possibly could to tell him that there is a God who made this place we call home.

  The "church" is often criticized for not doing enough in the world.  You might have all the answers.  For me, I don't know what else we're expected to do.  I don't know what else you would expect Ken Ham to do.  As for me, I write books (not many people want them). I write blogs, and they are available around the world, in different translations (not many people read them). I preach (christians seem to be the only ones who want to listen).  I'm doing everything I know to do in order to try and reach the world, as I trust you are if you belong to Christ. (Are you doing all you can?)

  As for being without excuse, I don't think I've heard of anyone being otherwise.  As I follow the Nye/Ham debate, everyone who comments on the articles I've read already have their stand.  It is extremely rare to hear someone say, "Gee.  I really don't have any pre-formulated thoughts or opinions about God.  Tell me more." If you ever meet such a creature, let me know.  I'll try to sell them one of my books.

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Sound Doctrine

Sound Doctrine

"But as for you, teach what accords with sound doctrine." (Titus 2:1 ESV)

   This past Wednesday morning, I had breakfast at McDonalds with a pastor from a church in the Aylmer area.  We began our time together arguing over who was going to pay for breakfast.  (An argument that I won by the way.  I'm not sure whether it was my pride or my generosity that compelled me to pay.)

  We talked about many different things, from family, to the goings on in our respective churches.  We eventually got on to the topic of doctrine, and his words continue to remain with me.  

  "Sound doctrine....What is sound doctrine anyway?  Sound doctrine is doctrine which is sound."

  Miriam-Webster defines sound as follows,

  "Free from mistakes, demonstrating good judgment, solid and strong."

   Imagine we are speaking of a foundation.  A foundation with cracks in it wouldn't be sound enough to build a house on.  When we take solid stands on teachings that are not sound, it opens us up for unnecessary criticism.   We often take enough criticism without providing an opportunity.

    If you understand this passage of scripture, you'll be able to understand why I take my stands the way I do, and why I don't always adopt other people's pet doctrines.  You should also be able to understand why I have to tell you at times, that I simply do not know for sure.   What makes a teaching sound anyway?  For me, the answer is simple.  Scripture is the bedrock by which we evaluate whether or not a teaching is sound.  I'm not going to intentionally take a doctrinal stand on something I do not see clearly spelled out in The Bible.  Sorry.  (Actually.  I'm really not sorry)

  I can confidently tell you that Jesus is the visible image of the invisible God.  Do you know why I can authoritatively say such a thing?  Because scripture says so.  If you don't believe me, check out Colossians 1:15.

  I can also say emphatically, that we are saved by grace through faith in Christ Jesus.  I can build on that as a foundation, because it is sound, and the reason it is so reliable, is because scripture speaks the very same words.  I can also say that Jesus was born of a virgin.  Know why I say that?  You're catching on.

  What I find really strange in my role as an elder, is when Christians get upset with me because I don't agree with them on things that aren't completely sound.  If I'm going to say that God is "this or that"' I need to be quite certain He is "this or that" by what is revealed in scripture.

  How about your doctrines?  How sound are they?  Is it clearly spelled out in scripture, or do you need to read your favourite blog, preacher or author in order to make you feel secure in your stand?  Is it well within what is written, or do you have to develop a case?


Examples of Sound Doctrine

   This coming Sunday, I will be speaking at my church, and to be forthcoming, I've been apprehensive about the message that has been laid on my heart.  The reason why I'm apprehensive, is because the sermon I have in store , isn't the kind of sermon I like to listen to.

  I like to listen to sermons that really walk through scripture word, by word; sermons that harp on sin and point to the cross of Christ.  Those ones light my spiritual fire (so to speak).  The message I have in mind is one mostly for moms and dads, encouraging them to be faithful to each other and to their families.

  As I consider what it really means to be sound, it gives me a sense of peace.  The message I am about to give is sound.  I might not be spot on for absolutely every application I touch on, but believers really should be faithful.  Faithfulness is a fruit of the Holy Spirit.  Moms and dads really should be faithful, and if they aren't, they need to repent.  That IS sound, even if it doesn't have the flavour of old time religion.

   As I leave for the night, I will leave you with the context of this passage in Titus, to look at what Paul was speaking on when he spoke about "sound doctrine".  As you read his words, ask yourself whether or not these are the things you think of when you think of sound doctrine.  This is what sound doctrine looks like;

  "Older men are to be sober-minded, dignified, self-controlled, sound in faith, in love, and in steadfastness. Older women likewise are to be reverent in behavior, not slanderers or slaves to much wine. They are to teach what is good, and so train the young women to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled, pure, working at home, kind, and submissive to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be reviled. Likewise, urge the younger men to be self-controlled." (Titus 2:2-6 ESV)

PS I feel rather secure in thinking that for the believer, to be absent from the body is to be present with The Lord, but I've been challenged on that as of late. I'm prepared to be wrong.