A couple of old friends of mine posted an article about
Miley Cyrus and Robin Thicke’s MTV performance, and I’ve been thinking about it
ever since. The article was speaking
against people who were offended at Miley’s crotch grabbing, but fine with Robin’s
contribution to the world’s rape culture.
What kept going through my mind was this question, “Who was the article
written to?”
I mean,
seriously. What kind of sick, demented
freak would be fine with Robin’s Blurred Lines, and have issues with Miley? All of the people I know take just as much
issue with the hump-er, as the hump-ee.
I do my
personal best to understand people, and looking at what I see in the media, it
does seem that Miley has taken more heat than Alan Thicke for rubbing their
unmentionables. Part of it is simply the
injustice itself, the injustice that women tend to be easier targets. Our world gives more leeway for men to
indulge themselves. But is that the
target of the article? Who are the
people that are offended at Miley, but fine with Robin? I wanted to know.
Let’s Call Them, Them
I can’t
call them we, because I’m not among them, and neither do I know anyone who
would be fine with what Robin Thicke represents.
I have a sneaking suspicion however, that They might be a certain kind
of Christian. It’s just a guess, but
suppose that They are.
Christians
really don’t belong to this world, but there is something in most of Them that
kind of wants to participate in the general goings on of this planet. They don’t really want to boycott absolutely everything. They would like very much to have cable/satellite
or internet TV, collect DVD’s and download music on iTunes. Really.
There is so much filth in this world, they are almost searching for something
acceptable.
So when
a young Hanna Montana comes on the scene, in a strange way, many of them are
more than happy to embrace her. Perhaps
that was their great folly. Although
quite superficial, glittery and seeking fame, she seemed clean enough, which
made her tolerable. She was even said to
be a Christian (whatever that means), so it must be acceptable for your kids to
listen to. Right?
That
doesn’t answer it. Does it? Why?
Why would someone be upset at Miley, but tolerate Robin? Why, why, why? Allow me to answer with a phrase:
Unreasonable, Unmet Expectations
They
had hoped for more from Myley Cyrus.
Apparently she was a Christian.
It’s not like there are a lot of Christian laws on this sort of thing,
but dry humping really isn’t something that is done in most churches on a
Sunday morning. Not the ones I have been
to anyway.
They
had wanted Miley Cyrus to be someone they could embrace. Never have they held similar hopes for Robin Thicke. It was pretty much assumed from
the beginning that he was a dog. The
public isn’t really outraged when a drug dealing thug shoots a police officer,
or when a Muslim kills a cartoonist. It’s
kind of what you expect. The public
outrage comes when police kill a citizen, a Christian burns a Koran, or a
priest molests a child, because those things are out of place.
I’m not an American, but I kind
of wonder if what They see in Miley, in a way highlights the greater disappointment
They have with Their own nation. America
isn’t Heaven, but isn’t there a desire in many Americans, which hoped their
country would be better than the rest of the world? They had wanted a place that’s clean, but it
has ended up just as filthy, if not more so, than any other place on
earth. (I would say that it is filthier) So what They see in Miley, brings to mind not
only the immorality of celebrity culture, but the very failure of Their nation,
and perhaps even that of Their own families.
It was
unreasonable for anyone to have hoped for Miley to be anything but what she
is. She is the very embodiment of what
MTV hopes to produce. Robin embodies it
for the male gender, but he is what we all expected him to be. Their expectations for Miley however were
different.
As For Me...
I’ve
talked a lot about Them. How about
me? Do you wonder where I stand?
Mostly
I just have a lot of questions. I wonder
why feminists are not more disdainful about how one of their own would play her
part in blurring the lines between consent and rape. I wonder how wretched we have to become,
before we realize that something is dreadfully wrong. It used to be offensive when Elvis shook his
hips. I wonder what the next step down
will be. I wonder when men will become
men. I wonder how much lower we can sink
before we fall apart. More importantly,
How
much more can we degrade ourselves?
(Yes. BOTH men AND women)
PS - And if you are the one who wrote the original article....How about it? Are They your Them? Who were you writing to?
PS - And if you are the one who wrote the original article....How about it? Are They your Them? Who were you writing to?
It definitely is filthier. I'm not proud to live here. I have no sense of patriotism that people twenty years my senior seem to. There is no "my country, right or wrong." And I hate the culture. My hope is that what happens in people's living rooms is somehow drastically different from what our lovely media and entertainment representatives portray. There's no real way of knowing.
ReplyDeleteThe answer to your question is simple: we can degrade ourselves as much as the pagans surrounding the Israelites did: orgies and child sacrifice. Really, we're already there. It's just more high tech now.
The real question is to what extent should Christians participate in the culture of the world, how vocal are we to be, and in what manner? I'm not even on the same wavelength as my fellow congregants, so what hope is there of engaging nonbelievers?
I don't have the answers to your questions. (And I doubt you expect me to) How vocal are we to be? I'll be thinking about that one for a while.
ReplyDelete